Groundbreaking CAPTAIN MARVEL Flies in With the Best Origin Story Since IRON MAN

Groundbreaking CAPTAIN MARVEL Flies in With the Best Origin Story Since IRON MAN

Originally published March 7, 2019 at Cinapse.co.

Captain Marvel is something of a miracle. It somehow took the most massive franchise in cinema history almost a decade to star a female superhero, as well as let a woman co-direct, and after all of that fervor there was almost no way it could live up to what it needed to be. As a sequel to the previous films in the series, it needed to be funny, look like a Marvel Movie, have a franchise-relevant MacGuffin, and feature a beloved actor as a villain. To adequately tell a story for female fans of the series, it couldn’t just be unique because it starred a woman, it needed to address this, but also show her as a strong hero independent of her gender. As a response to all of the children on the internet who couldn’t handle a female superhero, it needed to — well it didn’t need to do anything, but it would be nice to poke fun at them. Thankfully, it succeeds on all of these levels, and though it bears the flaws of most Marvel movies, isn’t that kind of the point?

Brie Larson takes the title role as Carol Danvers (aka Vers), who begins the film as some sort of alien super-soldier on the alien planet of Hala, home of alien race The Kree. Though The Kree were the villains of 2014’s Guardians of the Galaxy, they’re just people in their own civilization here, ruled by a being known only as The Supreme Intelligence. Gifted with the power to shoot weird beams of power from her fists, he works together with a team that basically functions as a Kree answer to the Guardians of the Galaxy, led by their very own Normal White Guy, Jude Law’s Yon-Rogg. Yon-Rogg and the rest of the Kree, in their own Jedi Order-like way, insist that emotion is the enemy, and the only way to properly control her power is by suppressing it. The first act is full-on space-fantasy, focusing heavily on the Kree’s war with the Skrull, a villainous, shape-shifting race. It takes a surprisingly dark tone that is sure to turn some people off, as it’s a bit of a break against form for the franchise, but it works quite well — we’re introduced to the mostly brutal life of a soldier in space, and then the whole thing starts to unravel.

Inevitably, the war leads Carol to Earth, a place she’s seemingly never been, but it awakens dormant memories of life as a normal human. Everything takes a hard turn in the second act, as directors Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck shift everything on its head, pairing Carol with a young Nick Fury (Samuel C.G.I. Jackson). This wildly fun midsection swings fully into Jason Bourne-meets-Shane Black, as they try to decipher her past whilst slinging banter and fighting enemies. The visual effects that make Jackson look like the 90s version of himself are pretty astounding, miles ahead of Michael Douglas’ rubbery face in 2015’s Ant-Man. Jackson works brilliantly in the role again, convincingly naive but still the cynical character we know as an adult. As we see him start to understand his own place in the larger universe, Jackson is probably the best he’s been as Fury since first putting on the eyepatch 11 years ago. He plays brilliantly against Larson, who herself delivers a powerful performance that embodies the uncertainty and courage of a super-weapon learning to become a superhero. Her stoic demeanor at the beginning starts to fade away as she becomes a sort of fun-loving cornball, impressed with her own powers.

Basically every performance in Captain Marvel rules, but Boden and Fleck’s greatest success is the film’s always-interesting, frequently shifting tone. The very dark, war-heavy opening is a great way to introduce the person who Carol is at the film’s start, but it transforms just as she does. As she (and filmmakers Boden and Fleck) clearly starts to become more comfortable, the movie embraces a sense of fun. It’s not a joke factory, the way your Ant-Mans and Iron Mans are, but the jokes have a wickedly high success rate. The filmmakers are even able to milk some hilarious moments from the villainous Skrull Talos, played tremendously by Ben Mendelsohn. Mendelsohn adopts a variety of accents for his many forms, each more ridiculous than the last, but always keeps a humorously aloof face, even under pounds of prosthetic makeup. He’s also not the only one to mine facial humor, which seems to be a style choice by Boden and Fleck — basically everyone in this movie delivers odd, perfectly timed bits of physical humor, and it’s a great departure from the MCU’s typical quip-based humor.

Because of this perfectly executed tone and a cast packed full of lovable, smaller characters that I won’t spoil in this reviewthe 124-minute runtime flies by. This is a very good thing, but it makes it easy to overlook some of the issues that arise when looking back on the film. When you piece together the story and look at everything as a whole, there isn’t anything too uncommon about the story itself. Deftly handled subtext aside, it’s just another Marvel story with a forgettable villain and a simple, a-to-b-to-c plot. Additionally, there’s an unfortunate fact that most Marvel fans don’t care to admit, but has always been true: these films are usually ugly. Aside from outliers like Black Panther and Guardians of the Galaxy, they usually lack any sense of visual style. Grays dominate most of these movies, with wide shots and backlit environments making every moment clear and easily-accessible, but devoid of personality. Captain Marvel is sadly not an outlier, mostly retaining that same color palette and lighting technique. If anything, some moments are even worse, burying key story moments in a cloud of darkness. This is a problem Marvel needs to fix, but the question is how? Is the issue that Feige keeps too tight of a leash on his filmmakers. To paraphrase fellow film critic Sam Banigan of the Welcome Back podcast, will the next phase of Marvel films be a slog to sit through, or will Feige finally allow filmmakers like Edgar Wright (who was fired from Ant-Man) to make something weird in the universe?

Though the look and general narrative feels stale, the six credited writers still do a brilliant job and one of the toughest tasks — addressing the character’s importance in her universe, but also our own. Over these last 11 years, Marvel Entertainment has produced a whopping 20 movies, the longest continuous story in film history. Though it undoubtedly took Feige far, far too long, he’s finally taking steps forward, in just the last 16 months delivering Thor: Ragnarok (the first directed by a person of color), Black Panther (one of the first predominantly black casts in a blockbuster film, and a groundbreaking step forward for black representation in cinema), Ant-Man and the Wasp (the first to feature a woman as the co-lead). Captain Marvel understands its groundbreaking place in this line of films, and expertly uses the platform to tell a story about being a female-presenting person in modern society. Whether Carol is dealing with Kree, humans, or the sci-fi embodiment of cultural norms, people continue to find reasons to tell her she can’t do something. When we finally see her overcome that and become Captain Marvel, it’s a breathtaking, powerful moment, one that stands up to anything else in the Marvel Universe.

Throughout the MCU’s first 20 entries, six have been origin stories. Boss Kevin Feige kept a high focus on hero-creation narratives in the early days of The Marvel Cinematic Universe, but has pared down in recent years, instead focusing on sequels and fully formed heroes in their own right — to mixed success. Where Ryan Coogler found success with this formula by beginning Black Panther in a world where T’Challa is already a hero, Spider-Man: Homecoming faltered. John Watts briefly flashed past Uncle Ben’s death and turned Peter Parker into a generic, quippy child, devoid of the motivation and buried tragedy that defines the character. With Captain Marvel, Boden and Fleck wisely go back to the origin story, allowing us to meet Carol Danvers before she inevitably groups up with The Avengers. Through a masterful grasp on tone, a bevy of strong performances and a hell of a moving climax, it bypasses every origin since we first saw Tony Stark break out of a cave with the first Iron Man suit. And now, 11 years later, we only have to wait two months before Captain Marvel becomes the one to save him, and connect fists with with the Universe — and her fists with Thanos’ face.

The New Halloween is The Last Jedi of the Series – And That’s a Good Thing

The New Halloween is The Last Jedi of the Series – And That’s a Good Thing

Originally published October 21, 2018 at CBR.com.

From its opening scene, Halloween (2018) plays with the viewer’s expectations. Director David Gordon Green clearly knows what franchise die-hards expect, and has absolutely no intention of delivering on it, instead opting to take the movie in a new, exciting direction. His ability to breathe subversive life into a 40 year old franchise is one-of-a-kind in our nostalgia-focused culture of remakes, reboots and Legacy Sequels, save for one exception: Rian Johnson’s breathtaking Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

The new Halloween begins in a chess-like checkered courtyard, as two podcasters (it is 2018 after all) confront the imprisoned Michael Myers in a mental health institute. Though the continuity of the film ignores all entries in the series save the first, it expects you to know what happens next: The Shape will rise, murder the ones harassing him and escape.

Instead, Green and co-writers Danny McBride and Jeff Fradley turn the script on its head and Michael does nothing. Try as hard as they can, even bringing out the infamous mask, the podcasters only end up disturbing the other prisoners, and the film’s intro is unceremoniously over.

This opening sequence, while full of Halloween’s trademark dread, proves massively unconventional for the series. By introducing a familiar situation but bucking the trend in its resolution, the scene creates far more questions than answers, and makes a clear statement: this is still Halloween, but not like you know.

In last December’s Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Johnson broke ground by weaponizing expectations in the same way, but for the George Lucas’ acclaimed sci-fi franchise. In The Last Jedi, Johnson sets up common Star Wars scenarios, like a rebel assault on an enemy base or a secret plan that will surely save the day, and perfectly subverts the way these typically pan out.

RELATED: Listen to the Halloween Reboot Soundtrack in its Entirety

Johnson, knowing that the rebels always get away and that poorly hatched schemes always work out, grounds his film with legitimate consequences. When Luke Skywalker barely considers snuffing out a padawan, he creates one of the greatest villains in the series. When Poe Dameron ignores orders, he destroys half the fleet of The Resistance.

Though the Star Wars franchise has had great moments in the last couple of decades, The Last Jedi brought back the propulsive energy of uncertainty the series lacked since Return of the Jedi.

The two films, released only 10 months apart, mark a huge step forward, not just in the history of the franchises, but in blockbuster filmmaking. Today, there is significant uproar about the idea of “nostalgia” as it affects the film industry. Studio executives vie for any property they can, because they know audiences will pay for the fuzzy feelings nostalgia can provide.

RELATED: Halloween Works Best When It’s About Female Empowerment

Ready Player One and Wreck It Ralph, for example, throw audiences back to their favorite “retro” experiences, but wrapped up in new stories; the idea of the ‘80s makes an appeal in Stranger Things and It (which doubles as a remake); and dozens of dormant franchises found revival both on TV and in theaters. For some reason, someone remade The Mummy. But the tendency to retread has grown old and worn, leading to art that feels stagnant and a wave of movies that are just “fine.”

But the brilliance of The Last Jedi, and now Halloween, lies in the practical path forward that they present. When a franchise shifts too far, audiences will reject it, like they did Halloween III: Season of the Witch, an entry which ditched Michael Myers altogether and failed miserably at the box office.

Though it still has a devoted group of fans, the left turn was too radical for the series, almost ending John Carpenter’s franchise in the process. But Johnson and Green introduce a new idea to reinvigorate their franchises: invest in recreating the atmosphere and basic story beats of the series, but use the crowd’s comfort to catch them off guard.

The last act of each film illustrates this perfectly, mirroring a specific series moment before unleashing all hell on the audience. Just as Kylo Ren betrays his master to join Rey, calling back to Darth Vader’s throne room turn in Return of the Jedi, Johnson reveals that it was out of selfish ambition rather than a selfless desire to save anyone else. Then, everything shifts and the story focuses on Luke’s helpless regret, and the small light of hope for the future.

On the flip side of that, with 30 minutes remaining in the new Halloween, it seems like Green is setting up a shameless re-do of the original’s last act. But as Allyson Strode follows in her grandmother’s footsteps, fleeing from Michael Myers to a neighbor’s doorbell, the neighbor actually answers the door and saves her life. Rather than take audiences back into a climactic cat-and-mouse showdown, the movie goes absolutely nuts.

RELATED: Rian Johnson Confirms His Star Wars Trilogy is Still Coming

The therapist, dubbed by Laurie as the “new Loomis,” adorns Michael’s mask and murders a police officer. Another officer’s head is used as a jack-o-lantern. In the end, the Strodes’ battle with Michael almost feels like a horrific version of Home Alone. The two movies go absolutely wild at their very ends, but not without first luring viewers into a false sense of security.

However, one thing that can’t go ignored is the fan response to these films. Time will tell how viewers respond to Halloween, but The Last Jedi had a very peculiar reception. The narrative a few months after release was that the film proved highly divisive among hardcore Star Wars fans, but recent studies have cast suspicion on that conclusion.

Apparently, many political figures (somehow including those from Russia) latched on to the progressive themes of the movie, leading an organized campaign to derail the film. Johnson’s film still made over a billion dollars worldwide, but it does have a very vocal minority of fans who cannot stand it. All you have to do is read the comments of any one of CBR’s own posts about Johnson or The Last Jedi to see they’re there.

Whether this is thanks to an aversion to the movie’s politics or a rejection of the way it changes what the series can be is a bit of a mystery, but it could potentially prevent this sort of radical push forward for franchises from coming again.

Hopefully the film industry will see the critical and box office success of these two movies and take note. As the creative sluggishness of nostalgia-mongering has held back so much of cinema in the past decade, these two huge breaths of fresh air have proven massively relieving. If we’re lucky, we might just be on the precipice of an amazing, fresh wave of blockbuster filmmaking.

REVIEW: Netflix’s Apostle Is Ambitious Horror That Falls Short in the End

REVIEW: Netflix’s Apostle Is Ambitious Horror That Falls Short in the End

Originally published at cbr.com.

Netflix’s Apostle has everything it should need to be one of the year’s best horror films. The cast, headlined by Dan Stevens and Michael Sheen, is stacked with underrated actors. The premise, about a man who goes undercover in a cult to save his sister, has intrigue but is open enough to go anywhere. The director, Gareth Evans, has two of the greatest action films of all time under his belt in The Raid and its sequel, and is returning to cult horror after an acclaimed segment in V/H/S 2. But it’s a shame the movie never quite comes together, giving each of its elements a chance to shine yet never quite working as a whole.

In The Raid and its sequel, Evans took a huge swing for the fences. The first is a claustrophobic masterclass in action cinema, and the second is a flawed but ambitious crime saga, punctuated by the director’s trademark eye for fight scenes. Apostle is every bit as ambitious as those first two efforts, but lacks the narrative cohesion to reach those highs. The action beats remain better than pretty much anything else attempted these days, but they’re strung together by a lackluster script. It feels as if the movie can’t decide whether it’s psychological horror, a gore showcase or an all-out action film, and is never able to mesh the three into something coherent.

RELATED: Gareth Evans’ Bloody Apostle Trailer Pits Dan Stevens Against a Cult

Stevens stars as Thomas Richardson, who in 1905 goes undercover on an island inhabited by a fanatical cult to rescue his sister, whom they’ve kidnapped. From there, the plot takes more twists and turns than one can count, and it’s best to go in as blind as possible; if you can avoid the trailers, do so at all costs. The opening hour or so, before it takes that darker turn, is a slow burn that feels closer to Karyn Kusama’s The Invitation than the wild action of The Raid. It’s this quiet, more deliberate segment where Apostle shines brightest, utilizing Evans’ proclivity for visual storytelling but never indulging in it. The film uses the freedom of having extra time to build an uneasy tone and establish the characters, while also planting seeds that there is something deeply wrong on the island.

The broad cast of characters is actually quite deep, from young lovers played by Bill Milner and Kristine Froseth to a disgruntled villager portrayed by the scene-stealing Ross O’Hennessy. The strongest of these supporting players are Sheen as the town prophet and Lucy Boynton as his daughter Andrea. Sheen is brilliant as the prophet, confident as he leads the village, but a crumbling, weak man when confronted with difficulty. He has the appearance of strong leadership in front of the cult members, but Sheen shows that he’s riddled with self-doubt, a shadow of the man who gives the sermons. Boynton is even better as his daughter, one of the village’s most compassionate members, sometimes disobeying leadership to show kindness. Her performance demonstrates just how earnest Andrea is, imbuing her every word with meaning, a refreshing change of pace from the rest of the manipulators in the cast.

Unfortunately, a great roster of underrated actors is not enough to carry a film, and in the end an inconsistent script lets them down. The superior first act sells a growing dread quite well, slowly building the tension and teasing the darkness to come. As Stevens creeps around the creepy village, he finds clues and begins to piece together the evil that lies beneath the charming veneer of the town.

In movies that slowly build to a tone shift, there is usually a moment where the director makes a clear statement to the audience: This is no longer the same film. In Jeremy Saulnier’s Green Room, it switches from a tense thriller to a massive bloodbath within seconds, punctuated by a character’s arm taking a brutal chop from a machete. It’s this sort of moment that’s missing from Apostle, which leads to a really muddled transition. Based on the appeal of the trailers and marketing, Apostle was clearly leading to a gut-wrenching shower of gore from the start. Once it finally does reach this long-awaited payoff, it lands with a thud, killing off a primary character in a mean-spirited, offhanded way that doesn’t come off meaning anything.

RELATED: Overlord Is (Almost) Everything You Want From a Zombie Nazi Movie

From a technical perspective, every moment of Apostle is brilliantly crafted. Even the long stretch of brutality at the end, while unearned, is unmatched in modern filmmaking. Evans puts his action sensibilities to use and delivers one pulse-pounding barbarity after another. His kinetic, free-flowing camera keeps the stomach-churning bloodshed in clear view and forces you to watch, which is sure to have viewers at home screaming from their sofas. It’s just really disappointing that these scenes, while well-directed, don’t gel with the rest of the film, killing off the characters with glee as if they meant nothing to the story.

In Netflix’s Apostle, life is a never-ending hell. You can choose to believe in a God who demands living sacrifices or nothing at all, but you’ll probably meet an agonizing end anyway. The first hour or so builds to a nightmare of a conclusion, but it takes a far too convoluted path to get there. Fans of horror cinema with a heavy dose of nastiness, or those who are particularly attached to Evans’ unique brand of brutality, will surely find something to love. But after making two of the greatest genre films of the century, it’s disappointing to see the director brush with greatness yet fail to reach it.


Directed by Gareth Evans, Apostle stars Dan Stevens, Michael Sheen and Lucy Boynton. The film screened at Fantastic Fest in Austin, Texas ahead of its Oct. 12 release on Netflix.

Cast Shines, Not Much Else in Matthew McConaughey’s WHITE BOY RICK

Cast Shines, Not Much Else in Matthew McConaughey’s WHITE BOY RICK

Originally published at Cinapse.

Just ten years ago, Matthew McConaughey was unreliable at best. Generally, if he was in a movie, it was a safe bet he’d be the worst part of a mostly mediocre film. The early years of his career saw some success with films like Dazed and Confused and Contact, but that mid/late-2000s streak was *rough*. Failure to Launch? Fool’s Gold? Some movie called Surfer, Dude which is somehow a real flick about a surfer’s existential crisis? It looked down for the University of Texas graduate — and then The McConaissance struck. The exact start date is still up for debate, but around 2011 a switch struck, and within three years he had an Oscar and became one of Hollywood’s finest actors. With director Yann Demange’s biopic White Boy Rick, he’s completed his transformation, shining as the brightest part of a mostly mediocre film.

McConaughey plays Richard Wershe Sr., a supporting player to the film’s primary focus: Rick Wershe Jr. (newcomer Richie Merritt), his son and a prodigy drug dealer. Set in the mid ’80s, Wershe Jr. starts the movie selling guns for his ambitious father, but is slowly pulled into the world of drugs out of need for money and hereditary ambition. He is quickly recruited by the FBI and Detroit PD to be an informant, creating an interesting dichotomy for the character. This stretch of White Boy Rick is actually quite good, functioning as a knock-off brand Goodfellas with a dash of Scott Cooper’s Black Mass (remember that movie?!).

(Spoilers for a thirty-year-old true story, I guess) Obviously, things turn sour for the teenage kingpin, and so does the film. It’s a perfectly fine watch for 45 minutes or so, but unfortunately gets bogged down when it makes a turn for the serious. Now the film is never a comedy, but it’s an enjoyable watch as we see the character’s initial success. As he starts selling drugs for himself and the cops, Wershe Jr. earns the name White Boy Rick from his almost entirely black consumer base/new friend group. Merritt embodies this name change with his performance, slowly shifting the way he talks and even carries himself through the movie, a really impressive debut for a 17-year-old. But as it grows more grim, it almost feels like Demange loses touch with the film, delivering a lifeless, pretty boring final act.

For a film set in Detroit that opens at an NRA gun show, White Boy Rick doesn’t have a whole lot to say. Sure, it offhandedly addresses that white people caught with drugs will face a far shorter prison sentence, but it stops there. With so much else to discuss, it mostly just wants to talk about how badly the FBI screwed over this one kid. It is just sort of disappointing to sit through, watching Wershe Jr. absorb the speaking style and interests (and job, for that matter) of Detroit’s black community, but ending with passive-aggressive epilogue titles that are only angry at the FBI’s treatment of him. Reagan’s “Just Say No” campaign simmers in the background of the film, but the ending comes off as tone-deaf, ignoring the executive office’s campaign that disproportionately affected the lives of countless people of color, just to focus on a white man.

Without question, the brightest part of White Boy Rick is the performances from the absolutely stacked cast. Obviously, McConaughey steals every scene, acting as an imposing force upon the film. He plays it with a vaguely southern style, which doesn’t really match with a man who has spent his whole life in Michigan, but it works in the role. He’s switches, sometimes simultaneously, from a larger-than entrepreneur to a weak, self-conscious father who just wants his children to love and respect him. Even when McConaughey isn’t on screen, his presence is felt, as Merritt brilliantly mimics bits of his fictional father’s mannerisms and speaking style.

The supporting players of White Boy Rick are also great, with one of the year’s deepest rosters of great small roles. RJ Cyler (Me and Earl and the Dying Girl) and Jonathan Majors are also great, acting as Rick’s intro into Black society in Detroit. Cyler is particularly great, bringing a sense of life and fun to his scenes as Boo, Rick’s best friend. Jennifer Jason Leigh, Rory Cochrane, and Atlanta’s Brian Tyree Henry excel as the law enforcement officers that work with Rick. Henry is particularly enjoyable, humorously playing his DPD officer as one who is constantly annoyed with everyone. On the other hand, JJL does her best Kyra Sedgwick impression, acting as a cold foil to Henry’s antics. And finally, in their few scenes, Bruce Dern and Piper Laurie knock it out of the park as Wershe Sr.’s parents. Though they kind of feel like they walked out of a different movie, the two are absolutely hilarious, bickering and griping with everyone in sight, providing plenty of welcome laughs.

Despite the overwhelming amount of great performances, spotty direction and a highly flawed script sink White Boy Rick. It’s certainly worth seeing for the wealth of amazing actors, but there’s a reason it was released a month before the heart of Oscars season.

White Boy Rick opened in theaters September 14, 2018.

REVIEW: Halloween Is a Breathtaking Throwback That Moves the Series Forward

REVIEW: Halloween Is a Breathtaking Throwback That Moves the Series Forward

Originally published at cbr.com.

David Gordon Green’s Halloween is something of a miracle. After all, the creative team, whose experience is exclusively in comedy, had to deliver legitimate scares while making sense of a franchise with 11 films’ worth of convoluted history, and simultaneously doing something new. The odds seemed stacked against it, but Green presents an astonishing work that dives into the consequences of the 1978 original while still moving into uncharted territory.

In this age of reboots, remakes and rehashes, Halloween utilizes arguably the most intriguing approach to resurrecting a dormant property: the legacy sequel, which typically take place in the same same universe as the original, and frequently feature returning cast members, but make use of the time gap to present the franchise to a new generation. J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek and Disney’s Tron: Legacy have found mild success in that arena, but the revived Star Wars saga holds the real blueprint for injecting life into these old stories. And while Halloween doesn’t reach the heights of Rian Johnson’s Star Wars: The Last Jedi, it certainly represents a high-water mark, respectful of the past but never restrained by it.

RELATED: Listen to John Carpenter’s Revamped Halloween Theme

Jamie Lee Curtis returns to the series for the first time in 20 years as the original final girl, Laurie Strode. Writers Green, Danny McBride (yep, that Danny McBride) and Jeff Fradley decided to ignore every entry in the series that came after the John Carpenter original, which permitted them to effectively start from scratch. It’s 40 years to the day after Michael Myers terrorized Laurie and killed her friends, and the trauma of that experience has taken over her life. She’s spent four decades preparing for Michael’s return, basically barricading herself in a fortress, surrounded by weapons. Excavating real-world consequences from a 40-year-old slasher film is an interesting turn for the series, reminiscent of how Creed found a way to explore a darker fallout from the goofy Rocky IV. Curtis plays the role perfectly, transforming into a seemingly hardened warrior, who nevertheless frequently cracks under the paranoia that comes from having faced evil himself.

Halloween 2018

The portrayal of Michael also works surprisingly well, fleshing out the horror icon while retaining a necessary sense of mystery. The audience is introduced to Old Man Michael in the opening minutes as he’s interrogated by true-crime podcasters. Intriguingly, he doesn’t wear his classic mask until about a third of the way through the film, and it’s exactly that kind of restraint that makes this new vision of Halloween so great. Green withholds the mask from the viewers, waiting to unleash it at just the right time. The decision pays off, as Michael Myers’ first real moment back in costume is one of the best horror scenes in years, a tracking shot that follows The Shape in a violent return to form

Michael’s impact on the story can be felt in every scene, even when he’s absent. Laurie’s fear of the killer has poisoned her relationship with her family. Daughter Karen (Judy Greer), who was raised to prepare for Michael’s return, resents her mother’s all-consuming fear, but as the story begins, granddaughter Allyson (Andi Matichak) is desperate for her grandmother to play a role in her life.

RELATED: Halloween Early Reviews Call the Film the Best Since the Original

Among the most interesting parts of Halloween is how it uses the generational dynamic to investigate the lasting impacts of trauma. It’s odd to see such deep themes in a sequel to a 90-minute slasher, but it works surprisingly well. Laurie’s experience with Michael in 1978 could stand in for any harrowing experience, and Green’s point would remain: Allowing your life to become overwhelmed by fear is permitting evil to win. As the family starts to come together once again, it’s touching to see that dawn finally on Laurie.

When Halloween approaches its conclusion, it appears as if Green will take the easy way out, setting up a third act that goes for a recreation of the original’s. But just as you think you know how the rest of the film will play out, it takes an unexpected turn, and ends with a climax as surprising as it is thrilling. The final 45 minutes or so are wall-to-wall payoff — edge-of-your-seat filmmaking that’s both terrifying and electrifying.

With a creative team out of left field and the seemingly head-scratching decision to ignore 40 years of continuity, there weren’t many reasons to be optimistic about Halloween. But expectations be damned, the film is a blast from start to finish. The return of Laurie Strode, to say nothing of the mystery and brutality of Michael Myers, is welcome, but it’s the new additions that help to make Halloween a deeper, richer film than any the series has seen before. Respectful of the past but bold enough to push the series into the future, it’s among the best legacy sequels audiences could hope to see.


Directed by David Gordon Green, Halloween stars Jamie Lee Curtis, Judy Greer, Andi Matichak, Will Patton, Virginia Gardner and Nick Castle. The film screened at Fantastic Fest in Austin, Texas, ahead of its Oct. 19 theatrical release.

MILE 22: A Terrible Action Thriller for the Trumpian Age

MILE 22: A Terrible Action Thriller for the Trumpian Age

Originally published at Cinapse.

Director Peter Berg knows exactly what he’s doing. Since 2013’s ‘Merican war film Lone Survivor, he’s made Deepwater Horizon (a film about the BP oil spill that refused to engage with the entire oil industry’s problems) and the much-maligned Patriot’s Day, an all-too-soon adaptation of the Boston Marathon Bombings which Buzzfeed compared to a superhero movie about American police.

Through all of these thematic issues, unsettling as they are, Berg has shown a clear mastery of technical craft. Even in his earlier work, with Hancock and the film Friday Night Lights, he’s shown an understanding of story structure and directing techniques that justify the price of admission, despite how rough it can be to sit through the films. In Mile 22, Berg throws everything he knows about filmmaking out the window, settling for one of 2018’s most poorly made movies (with a dash of xenophobia).

Mark Wahlberg is in MILE 22

Mile 22 follows a small, deadly spy team that acts as America’s last line of conflict resolution, after “diplomacy” and “war.” Mark Wahlberg stars as team leader James Silva, accompanied by teammates played by Lauren Cohan and Ronda Rousey, with John Malkovich acting as the man behind the scenes.

Wahlberg’s character takes the leading role, what initially seems like a standard action hero, but he’s an elite military operative with extensive training, essentially transforming him into the perfect soldier. BUT he has a really wild side, so people have to watch out for him so he doesn’t snap. BUT he has a tragic past and mental issues which make him sympathetic. BUT he’s always the smartest guy in the room, so no one can ever top him. Basically, Wahlberg’s Silva is a half-blended mixture of a CBS detective, Batman, Jason Bourne, and The Punisher, executed with all the nuance you’d expect from Berg. Particularly egregious is the way it ostracizes people with mental health issues, reminiscent of Ben Affleck as an autistic assassin in Gavin O’Connor’s dreadful The Accountant. Mile 22 uses an ambiguous disorder to excuse Wahlberg’s mistreatment of his coworkers, as he starts every scene whispering and ends by screaming at the top of his lungs. Unfit to just be offensive, he’s a human crescendo, the most annoying lead in a film this side of Grown Ups.

Lauren Cohan is in MILE 22 too

The plot kicks off when Wahlberg and his team meet Iko Uwais’ Li Noor, a mysterious foreign agent with a hard drive that contains the locations of radioactive materials. Noor promises to unlock the device provided the team can transport him to the US, and the rest of the movie focuses on getting him the 22 miles (get it) to the airport against the wishes of terrorists, gangsters, and even the foreign police. The film is 95 minutes, but it takes an hour to understand exactly what the movie is about, and then the last 30 involve traveling those 22 miles. In a sense, its “world against you” structure evokes John Wick Chapter 2, except entirely incoherent. Every scene contains hundreds of lines spoken by characters, whether they are introduced or not, who mean nothing to the plot. Different policemen, soldiers, and secret agents will pop in for a second, deliver a horrible joke or a vital plot point, then leave the film for good. Because of this, it’s a quickly paced film with dialogue flying at you from all angles, but doesn’t actually go anywhere.

Yup, that Ronda Rousey

Worse is the implicit way Berg treats people, politics, and thematic statements. Mile 22 is never all that concerned with being a political movie, but it certainly feels like writers Lea Carpenter and Graham Roland (Lost, Jack Ryan) want the audience to know it still takes place in a political world. The characters randomly will make fun of Snapchat or millennials, but will have a collection of American president bobbleheads, complete with an absolute disaster of a Donald Trump bobblehead situated next to President Obama as if Trump is just another normal American president. Obviously all of the villainous characters just happen to be people of color, while all the heroic soldiers, police officers, and secret agents are white. The message of the film is clear, whether Berg intended this or not — only trust white, American law enforcement to save the day.

John Malkovich plays “mother” is a sentence I never expected to write

For its flaws as a story, there is nothing in Mile 22 as infuriating as the way it treats Uwais. The Indonesian star of Gareth Evans’ Raid films could potentially be the greatest action star currently working, and certainly has proved he deserves a place in the conversation with Headshot and Beyond Skyline. Uwais does not come to play, and after choreographing some of the best fight scenes of all time in both films in The Raid series, I was excited to see him listed as both star and fight choreographer in this movie. When he finally started fighting people, I almost leapt out of my chair with excitement, only to sink back in with disappointment — Peter Berg is one of the worst up-close action directors I’ve ever seen. His editing style is more egregious than the fence scene in Taken 3shaking the camera and cutting away so quickly it becomes literally impossible to make out anything. In probably seven or eight battles that Uwais fights in, only two or three are actually comprehensible; the rest make you feel like you’re in a gory blender.

As a film, a piece of propaganda, and a showcase for Iko Uwais, there are very few redeeming qualities in Mile 22. In between the nonsensical plot, stomach-churning editing, and poor acting, there is no reason to see this instead of Mission: Impossible — Fallout or rewatching The Raid. Just watch one of those instead, or do literally anything else — skip on this movie from the conservative reboot of Paul Greengrass.

Mile 22 opens in theaters August 17, 2018.

Oscar-nominated Chilean film ‘A Fantastic Woman’ puts a strong trans woman in the spotlight

Oscar-nominated Chilean film ‘A Fantastic Woman’ puts a strong trans woman in the spotlight

Originally published at The Daily Texan.

Watching “A Fantastic Woman,” I couldn’t help but think about the comments underneath a recent tweet by The Washington Times.

“Is Caitlyn Jenner a woman?,” the tweet reads. “A growing body of research says no.”

The replies contained a massive pool of insults, with some calling Jenner an “it,” others called her an “alien” and others called her a “monster.”

In this atmosphere, Chilean director Sebastián Lelio’s “A Fantastic Woman” boldly follows transgender woman Marina Vidal (Daniela Vega), who fights every day for the right to be herself. As the film progresses, it reveals itself as both a poignant story of loss and a window into the life of an unrepresented community. Lelio, simply by showing the struggles faced by a trans woman, is making a statement film, pulling double duty and succeeding on both levels.

The story opens with Orlando (Francisco Reyes), a divorced, cisgender, heterosexual man in a relationship with Marina. The two have a seemingly normal, healthy partnership — he works a day job, she waits tables and sings at a club, they go out for drinks and then head home to have sex. Lelio does not objectify or make a big deal out of Orlando and Marina’s sexual relationship. It just feels like another part of living. Their life feels routine, but never unromantic.

Very early on in the story, Orlando dies of a sudden aneurysm, and Marina is left to pick up the pieces of his life. Though not the first movie of this kind, “A Fantastic Woman” is a new take on the grief film, made so much more impactful by the size of the hole Orlando leaves in Marina’s life.

Orlando is survived by a brother, son and ex-wife, each of whom has their own terrible way of relating to Marina. Every member of this family represents a different manner in which society treats trans individuals, starting with Orlando’s acceptance of Marina and slowly disintegrating from there. His brother sees Marina as who she is, but is afraid to stand up to anyone for her; Orlando’s ex-wife sees Marina as a perversion, hurling verbal and psychological abuse at her in every scene; and Orlando’s son is the worst offender, physically assaulting Marina for her own existence. It makes for a brutally difficult film to watch, but a challenging, brilliant work of art.

Vega gives one of the best performances in any film released in the past year, and it’s a shame the film is only nominated for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar. Through a wide range of nuanced facial expressions and a towering screen presence, Vega dominates the movie. She largely plays Marina as a restrained, quiet individual, allowing glimpses of her grief through small facial tics and body posture. In the few moments where she’s allowed to let loose and show her emotion, Vega shows the tragic pain of a heartbroken, misunderstood human who just seeks acceptance. These moments where her pain surfaces act as punctuation marks on an already brilliant performance, proving Vega as a fully formed performer in only her second film.

It is groundbreaking that Vega is transgender herself, as Hollywood has a history of hiring cisgender men to play trans women, including Eddie Redmayne, Jared Leto and Jeffrey Tambor. But these actors generally tell the same story about a trans woman undergoing her transition, and Lelio has no interest in Hollywood’s vision of trans women. The picture he paints is of a woman undergoing a personal loss, a woman who faces an inordinate amount of obstacles, a woman who may be called “it,” “alien” and “monster,” but emerges fantastic.

“A Fantastic Woman”
Rating: R
Runtime: 104 minutes
Score: 4.5/5 stars

Photo Credit: Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

Ava DuVernay’s empathy saves the groundbreaking ‘Wrinkle in Time’ from getting lost

Ava DuVernay’s empathy saves the groundbreaking ‘Wrinkle in Time’ from getting lost

Originally published at The Daily Texan.

There are 375 movies in history with a budget of over $100 million , but the first of these films directed by a woman of color arrives this Friday with “A Wrinkle in Time” from Ava DuVernay.

Much hype has followed “A Wrinkle In Time” since its announcement in 2016, and many have paired the film with last month’s “Black Panther” as milestones in Hollywood’s march toward progress. Although it doesn’t quite hit as hard as Ryan Coogler’s superhero masterpiece, DuVernay’s “Wrinkle” is a charming fantasy epic, a film that swings for the fences at every turn and hits more than it misses.

Young actress Storm Reid leads the film as Meg Murry, a brilliant 14-year-old student who has been emotionally distant ever since the disappearance of her father (Chris Pine) four years earlier. Meg’s parents are NASA scientists, but her mother (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) drifts away from the field after her husband’s disappearance. Early flashbacks and prologues show Meg and her parents working on experiments together, and it’s refreshing to see black women scientists, as opposed to bespectacled white dudes huddled around a table.

Just before Mr. Murry’s disappearance, the couple adopted a young son, Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe), who grows up with Meg. To get a sense of Meg and Charles Wallace’s life before the adventure begins, the film shows a normal day at school for the two of them, and it is incredibly painful to watch. Meg is bullied; Charles Wallace hears teachers gossip about their father; the principal gives Meg a lecture. It all feels ripped out of a lower-tier Disney Channel Original Movie. This series of events thankfully constitutes only the film’s first fifteen minutes, but it kicks off an epic fantasy adventure with a whimper.

It’s a great relief when Mrs. Which (Oprah Winfrey), Mrs. Whatsit (Reese Witherspoon) and Mrs. Who (Mindy Kaling) finally enter the film, providing it with exactly the burst of energy and light it needs. They tell Meg that they need her to help them save her father, and then they whisk her, Charles Wallace and their friend Calvin (Levi Miller) away on a galaxy-hopping adventure.

Though the first act of “A Wrinkle in Time” is conventional and exposition-heavy, it all acts as a setup for DuVernay to absolutely let loose, and the film quickly goes from cringeworthy to crowd pleasing. It does not spend too much time bogged down in the hows and whys of the characters’ supernatural abilities or otherworldly looks — these things just are. Winfrey, Witherspoon and Kaling breathe humorous guiding light into the movie, but Meg, Calvin and Charles Wallace have to figure out their own way through the universe to Meg’s father.

The extraterrestrial locales visited by the trio borrow heavily from other sources, including Dr. Seuss, “The Wizard of Oz,” “Avatar” and sometimes even Japanese video games, such as “Xenoblade Chronicles.” Some are whimsical, some are intimidating, but they are all engaging. Instead of focusing on the science of space travel and other planets, the film focuses on its characters, their relationships with one another and their relationships with themselves.

As the film goes on, DuVernay grows more confident, concluding the story with a trippy, mind-bending metaphor of a finale that one would expect from high-concept science fiction, not a Disney fantasy-adventure. Throughout the film, Meg grapples with herself and the person she feels pressured to be, rather than who she is. As she barrels toward this conclusion, it becomes clear that her journey is just as much about her own growth as it is about her father.

In spite of its flaws, “A Wrinkle in Time” is an earnest plea for how much better the world could be if we loved ourselves and loved one another. As corny as that sounds, the plea, like the movie, rings true.

“A Wrinkle in Time”

Rating: PG

Runtime: 109 minutes

Score: 3.5/5 stars

 

Comedy thriller ‘Game Night’ plays into genre tropes, fails to play up the laughs

Comedy thriller ‘Game Night’ plays into genre tropes, fails to play up the laughs

Originally published at The Daily Texan.

“Game Night” feels like a film conceived by two extraordinarily high filmmakers between tokes: What if David Fincher’s “The Game” met the Steve Carell/Tina Fey vehicle “Date Night,” and it was about people who liked having a game night?

The resulting story is a sloppy, half-baked franken-script of two infinitely better films, a movie which should’ve been left on the cutting-room floor. Surprisingly effective direction from John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein, the helmers of 2015’s “Vacation” remake, and a brilliant cast led by Jason Bateman try their hardest to save the film, but nothing can salvage the bad script packed with cheap jokes.

Bateman and Rachel McAdams lead as Max and Annie, a hyper-competitive married couple who host game night with their friends every week. When Max’s equally competitive brother Brooks (Kyle Chandler) comes to town, he throws a wrench into their regular plans, asking to host a “very special” game night at his house.

Brooks’ idea of a game night involves hiring actors to come in and “kidnap” one of the party’s members, leading the rest in a race to find the missing individual. It’s an escape room meets The Game from “The Game,” a large-scale competition where no one knows what is real and what isn’t. From there, the plot borrows the structure and elements of “Date Night” as the group gets tied up in what seems to be real trouble, involving gangsters, drugs, a car chase and potentially real kidnapping.

While there’s nothing wrong with well-executed genre parody, films that specifically parody one other film never work, and “Game Night” is certainly the newest addition to that club. Though the film could easily have used its plot to make a broader parody of the action/thriller genre, all of its jokes fall into three categories: easy, implicit references to “The Game” (which is 20 years old), mindless references to any number of pop culture icons, and the seldom clever, well-earned joke. It leads to an exhausting time, one that moves at an extraordinarily brisk pace but is still somehow boring.

It’s a shame that writer Mark Perez drops the ball so hard, because everyone else attached to the movie puts in some of their best work. However, no one matches Jesse Plemons as creepy neighbor Gary. Plemons steals the show in only three or four scenes, each of which are the film’s only laugh-out-loud moments.

Daley and Goldstein miraculously show themselves as fully formed comedy directors, trying their hardest to work with the script they’re given. All of the establishing shots in “Game Night” are not the typical footage of exteriors, but of highly detailed dioramas, making the whole movie feel like it takes place on a game board. These little touches give the film its only semblance of personality.

However, none of these touches are as impactful as the comedic action centerpiece, a multi-minute single take that is some of the best physical comedy in any recent movie not featuring the small bear Paddington. The camera dances around a massive house, following the many characters and giving each a chance to stand out, not unlike the casino fight in last week’s “Black Panther.”

Brilliant direction and hilarious performances abound in the film, but it’s hard to love. Last year, “The Big Sick” and “Darkest Hour” proved strong scripts can overcome sloppy direction. If there’s anything “Game Night” proves, it’s that no amount of excellence can save a bad script.

“Game Night”

Rating: R

Runtime: 100 minutes

Score: 2.5/5 stars